Becker is a well-known brand among accountants who want to pursue CPA in the US.
Becker discontinued its CMA review course in 2006, but 3 years ago the company relaunched a new self-study course and live classes through international partners.
Based on the limited information on their site, I have the following preliminary analysis on Becker vs Gleim vs Hock for CMA exam preparation:
|Becker CMA||Gleim CMA||Wiley CMAexcel||Hock CMA|
|IMA Licensed / Strategic Partner|
|# Practice Questions||2,000+||2,900+||1,850+||2,245|
|Customer Service||Technical support only||Personal counselor||Technical support only||Technical support only|
|Free Trial||(14 days)||(Unit 1)||(14 days)|
|Access Time-limit||24 months||18 months or until you pass*||12 or 24 months||Unlimited|
|Money-Back Guarantee||Re-registration Guarantee|
|Pricing (2-parts)||$1,290||$1,124 (w coupon)||$1,795||$1,099|
|Recommendation & Analysis||Gleim CMA analysis||Wiley CMA analysis||Hock CMA analysis|
The encouraging news is that Becker CMA finally introduces a 14-day free trial. If you are interested or that your employer is willing to sponsor the Becker CMA course for you, it’s good to take a look and compare the offering with the competitors. Gleim and Wiley also have free trials that you can sign up without strings attached.
I signed up for the free trial. As you see below, it has a nice clean layout with a basic progress stats and chart.
There are also useful features such as e-flashcards and the ability to take notes electronically. I am not sure what the collaboration works but it sounds intriguing:
Becker CMA does have one of the longest access period for the online practice questions — 24 months.
One thing that’s special about Becker is that they run live classes. For now, live classes are run in selected countries with their international partners:
From what I know, Becker CMA Review is not a product of Becker. It is simply a reseller of a product developed by Power Resources.
Have you heard of this company? I have, but only because I have been covering this industry for 6 years. During this period I have exactly one reader who tried one of their products. I don’t see why I have to take the risk in this course vs other established providers
Update (Oct 2017): I notice that “Power Resources” is no longer mentioned on the Becker CMA website or in the free trial that I sign up for.
Instead, I see a familiar face — Brian Hock from Hock CMA as the instructor. Can’t be 100% sure because the instructor doesn’t introduce himself, but it’s the same exact look, voice and even the same white shirt that you may see in some Hock youtube videos. Looks to me that they slap existing Hock course into Becker’s under some sort of agreement.
Hock is a much better partnering choice in my opinion, but as a consumer, why wouldn’t I go for Hock for a lot less?
Although the online platform is light weight and seems to run fast on the internet, it lacks a few important features. For example, the study plan is simply one PDF file with a suggested time table. This is far below the standard when interactive and personalized study planners are quite common nowadays.
The practice questions are not presented in a simulated exam environment (i.e. it looks different from the one you will see in the real test). This is almost the most basic feature in other online courses.
There is also no audio review and no money-back guarantee.
Given the limited offering, it is surprising that Becker CMA is now priced at a higher level than the premium Gleim CMA Review System.
I understand the Becker is always priced at a big premium for their CPA product, but that’s different because of the history and reputation. It just doesn’t seem to make sense why I have to pay more for a seemingly inferior product for the CMA exam.
In 2014, I sent an email to Becker, hoping they will shed some light on their product offering. I specifically mentioned that I am a blogger of a CMA exam prep site and would like to get this info on behalf of my readers.
Three days later, the representative replied with the exact information on their website. After I brought this to her attention, here is the reply:
Thanks for contacting Becker Professional Education. You submitted your email as a Blogger. Becker only allows authorized Becker agents to promote Becker products. Therefore, the only information I can provide is the information listed on our website. If students are looking to register and submit these questions directly asking for specific information I can and will provide a direct answer to their questions. If you would like for me to submit your information to our marketing team for the approval to promote our CMA course on your website, I will be glad to do so.
Thanks for you understanding, and I do apologize that my first email did not clearly state the above.
The lady is courteous, but I don’t appreciate that I need an approval from Becker to talk about their product on my blog, and their assumption that I wanted to promote their product.
This was 3 years ago. They finally have a product description on their website and offer a free trial, so things seem to have improved. In terms of customer service however, I haven’t got or heard anything that would change my mind of their institutional (impersonal, inflexible and unhelpful) style.
The product and customer service hasn’t been impressive. For now I do not list Becker on my major CMA review course page.
If you are new to the CMA exam, there are several well established, family-run and caring review courses out there, as shown in the chart above.
Check out my comparison page on major CMA course providers.
If you are about to start your CMA journey, I am happy to help you out! Feel free to subscribe to my free mini course, to be delivered to your email for 7 days. You may also want to get the details of this mini e-course here.
I am the author of How to Pass The CPA Exam (published by Wiley) and the publisher of this and several accounting professional exam prep sites.
Please log in again. The login page will open in a new window. After logging in you can close it and return to this page.